| Author |
Thread |
|
Fr3z3r
Starting Member
Poland
14 posts
Joined: Nov, 2004
|
 Posted - 2005/01/13 : 11:45:53
What are the full lyrics for this track?
Thx.
Alert moderator 
|
Fr3z3r
Starting Member
Poland
14 posts
Joined: Nov, 2004
|
Posted - 2005/01/15 : 09:58:43
All right, so maybe this approach will get some response. ;)
Please, <something> the main comm
This is only a test, we repeat, this is only a test
The station in conjunction with other airwave announcements
Will conduct this exact test without <something>
Of the soul, the mind, the body
The positive, the negative, the ground
The proton, the neutron, the electron
The plaintiff, the defendant, the judgement
Alert moderator
|
chestah
Junior Member
Ukraine
82 posts
Joined: Oct, 2004
|
Posted - 2005/01/15 : 15:51:10
Please, do not be along the main comm
Alert moderator
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts
Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2005/01/15 : 17:32:35
quote:
Originally posted by Fr3z3r:
All right, so maybe this approach will get some response. ;)
Please, do not be alarmed, remain calm
This is only a test, we repeat, this is only a test
The station in conjunction with other airwave announcements
Will conduct this exact test under the Jurisprudence (a legal term)
Of the soul, the mind, the body
The positive, the negative, the ground
The proton, the neutron, the electron
The plaintiff, the defendant, the judgement
-----------------------------
Arguably one of the best
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
Edited by - djDMS on 2005/01/15 17:34:54 |
Fr3z3r
Starting Member
Poland
14 posts
Joined: Nov, 2004
|
Posted - 2005/01/16 : 14:23:17
quote:
Will conduct this exact test under the Jurisprudence
That's not all yet, DMS, it's like:
Will conduct this exact test <something> under the Jurisprudence <something>
And what "under the Jurisprudence" means, exactly?
Alert moderator
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts
Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2005/01/16 : 17:57:45
Sorry, my mistake. Should say -
Will conduct this exact test without prejudice under the Jurisprudence...of the soul etc
jurisprudence: an overview
The word jurisprudence derives from the Latin term juris prudentia, which means "the study, knowledge, or science of law." In the United States jurisprudence commonly means the philosophy of law. Legal philosophy has many aspects, but four of them are the most common. The first and the most prevalent form of jurisprudence seeks to analyze, explain, classify, and criticize entire bodies of law. Law school textbooks and legal encyclopedias represent this type of scholarship. The second type of jurisprudence compares and contrasts law with other fields of knowledge such as literature, economics, religion, and the social sciences. The third type of jurisprudence seeks to reveal the historical, moral, and cultural basis of a particular legal concept. The fourth body of jurisprudence focuses on finding the answer to such abstract questions as What is law? How do judges (properly) decide cases?
Apart from different types of jurisprudence, different schools of jurisprudence exist. Formalism, or conceptualism, treats law like math or science. Formalists believe that a judge identifies the relevant legal principles, applies them to the facts of a case, and logically deduces a rule that will govern the outcome of the dispute. In contrast, proponents of legal realism believe that most cases before courts present hard questions that judges must resolve by balancing the interests of the parties and ultimately drawing an arbitrary line on one side of the dispute. This line, realists maintain, is drawn according to the political, economic, and psychological inclinations of the judge. Some legal realists even believe that a judge is able to shape the outcome of the case based on personal biases.
Apart from the realist-formalist dichotomy, there is the classic debate over the appropriate sources of law between positivist and natural law schools of thought. Positivists argue that there is no connection between law and morality and the the only sources of law are rules that have been expressly enacted by a governmental entity or court of law. Naturalists, or proponents of natural law, insist that the rules enacted by government are not the only sources of law. They argue that moral philosophy, religion, human reason and individual conscience are also integrate parts of the law.
There are no bright lines between different schools of jurisprudence. The legal philosophy of a particular legal scholar may consist of a combination of strains from many schools of legal thought. Some scholars think that it is more appropriate to think about jurisprudence as a continuum.
The above mentioned schools of legal thoughts are only part of a diverse jurisprudential picture of the United States. Other prominent schools of legal thought exist. Critical legal studies, feminist jurisprudence, law and economics, utilitarianism, and legal pragmatism are but a few of them.
-----------------------------
Arguably one of the best
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
|
B.C
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
1,747 posts
Joined: Jul, 2002
35 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2005/01/17 : 22:03:23
DMS..you have a wealth of knowledge indeed.
"Let's All Get Down!!"
__________________________________
"The music was like new, black, polished chrome
that came over the summer like liquid night"
Alert moderator
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts
Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2005/01/17 : 22:54:11
quote:
Originally posted by B.C_in_the_mix:
DMS..you have a wealth of knowledge indeed.
I certainly have mate.
Big up to the copy & paste crew!!!
-----------------------------
Arguably one of the best
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
|
|
Moved: 
Printer friendly
