| Author |
Thread |
|
Slammer_Jammer_Man
Average Member
Australia
242 posts
Joined: Jun, 2004
|
 Posted - 2005/09/22 : 11:41:42
Bonkers XIV says United In Dance Feat. Jenna are the artists behind Shining Down... however, on DI the other night Shining Down came on and I noticed that Force & Styles Feat. Jenna were attributed with it. Is it Bonkers that's wrong, or does DI have the MP3 mislabelled?
__________________________________
4 Tonnes of raw techno power!
Long live the NEC and all those innovative DJs tearing up dancefloors with Freeform and similar driving, experimental, high energy sounds!
http://www.nuenergy.co.uk/
http://www.finrg.com/
Alert moderator 
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts
Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2005/09/22 : 11:56:47
The original is Force & Styles, the new version is by United in Dance.
So if it's the new version you heard, it should have said United in Dance.
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
|
Slammer_Jammer_Man
Average Member
Australia
242 posts
Joined: Jun, 2004
|
Posted - 2005/09/22 : 12:06:36
Ah, I see. A little off topic, but I never really understood why it was done that way. Why does it come United in Dance Feat. Jenna - Shining Down rather than Force & Styles Feat. Jenna - Shining Down (United In Dance Remix)?
__________________________________
4 Tonnes of raw techno power!
Long live the NEC and all those innovative DJs tearing up dancefloors with Freeform and similar driving, experimental, high energy sounds!
http://www.nuenergy.co.uk/
http://www.finrg.com/
Alert moderator
|
Mortis
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
7,493 posts
Joined: May, 2004
341 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2005/09/22 : 12:10:00
quote:
Originally posted by Slammer_Jammer_Man:
Why does it come United in Dance Feat. Jenna - Shining Down rather than Force & Styles Feat. Jenna - Shining Down (United In Dance Remix)?
Thats just one of those great mysteries hey.
__________________________________
"Maybe in a day and age in which even our rappers can't get to the end of a verse without having an existential crisis, we should find a place for happy hardcore"
Alert moderator
|
clarke101
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,839 posts
Joined: Jun, 2003
185 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2005/09/22 : 12:20:05
Because its a cover not a remix
__________________________________
Panda Style
Alert moderator
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts
Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2005/09/22 : 12:22:09
It is a mystery.
Hard to see a difference between 'remix' and 'remake', but if the whole song has been done again from scratch (with re-sung vocals, albeit by the same vocalist) - then that explains how it can be released under a different artist name.
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
|
Printer friendly
