| Author |
Thread |
|
choonland
Advanced Member
Colombia
1,100 posts
Joined: Dec, 2007
|
 Posted - 2008/05/06 : 05:48:03
this may sound like a stupid question, but it has always confused me+
when naming a remix, it usually looks something like this:
artist A - name of the song (artist B remix)
this means that the orinigal version is from artist A, and Artist B did the remix??
OR, the original is from B and the remix from A?????
thats something has always hammered my mind :000
__________________________________
https://soundcloud.com/naturatech
Alert moderator 
|
Leto
Advanced Member
United States
2,849 posts
Joined: Jun, 2005
|
Posted - 2008/05/06 : 06:59:08
artist A did the song, artist B did the remix.
__________________________________
globalhardcorealliance.com
Alert moderator
|
Future_Shock
Advanced Member
Australia
2,483 posts
Joined: Apr, 2007
|
Posted - 2008/05/06 : 08:33:38
I always thought that was pretty self-explanitory myself...
but you know whatever
__________________________________
New Future Shock Hardcore: https://soundcloud.com/futureshockgroup
Alert moderator
|
Samination
Advanced Member
Sweden
13,248 posts
Joined: Jul, 2004
195 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2008/05/06 : 13:43:42
If the remix is an official one, then it's "Artist A - Track (Artist B remix)".
if not, then it's better to name it "Artist B - Track", or as people usually do "Anon - Track"
__________________________________
---------------------------------------------
Samination, Swedish Hardcore DJ
Happy, UK Hardcore, Freeform, Makina and Gabber
http://samination.se/
---------------------------------------------
Alert moderator
|
warped_candykid
Advanced Member
United States
3,986 posts
Joined: Jan, 2004
|
Posted - 2008/05/06 : 14:16:08
I thought Anon was a real person, the one off Balltisic Bootlegs.
Alert moderator
|
bulby_g
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
7,205 posts
Joined: Apr, 2004
430 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2008/05/06 : 14:27:20
quote:
Originally posted by warped_candykid:
I thought Anon was a real person, the one off Balltisic Bootlegs.
 They just put anon on unlicensed remixes (bootlegs) so that it can't be tracked back to an artist so easily. It's not an artist.
__________________________________
www.myspace.com/bulbyg
Alert moderator
|
choonland
Advanced Member
Colombia
1,100 posts
Joined: Dec, 2007
|
Posted - 2008/05/06 : 14:33:15
quote:
Originally posted by bulby_g:
They just put anon on unlicensed remixes (bootlegs) so that it can't be tracked back to an artist so easily. It's not an artist.
can you get in trouble by doing an unlicensed remix, even if you are not selling it or anything, just for the fun?
__________________________________
https://soundcloud.com/naturatech
Alert moderator
|
bulby_g
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
7,205 posts
Joined: Apr, 2004
430 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2008/05/06 : 14:36:15
quote:
Originally posted by manuelf:
quote:
Originally posted by bulby_g:
They just put anon on unlicensed remixes (bootlegs) so that it can't be tracked back to an artist so easily. It's not an artist.
can you get in trouble by doing an unlicensed remix, even if you are not selling it or anything, just for the fun?
No mate, no one will be bothered if it's just for fun. If you release it they may decide to come after you... Most prolly wouldn't care anyway unless it was getting big sales.
__________________________________
www.myspace.com/bulbyg
Alert moderator
|
Moved: 
Printer friendly
