| Author |
Thread |
|
warped_candykid
Advanced Member
United States
3,985 posts
Joined: Jan, 2004
|
 Posted - 2008/08/05 : 04:48:04
My friend was telling me that she read off mugglenet.com that they were going to seperate the 6th movie into 2 seperate parts, part 2 being released a few months after part 1. Are they combining 7 with 6, or is movie 6 actually going to have 2 parts so nothing is left out?
Alert moderator 
|
Ph33rViper
Senior Member
Australia
251 posts
Joined: Dec, 2005
|
Posted - 2008/08/05 : 05:25:45
on IMDB
The Deathly hallows will be 2 parts
I think thats BS Just have it as one nice long movie :D
Alert moderator
Edited by - Ph33rViper on 2008/08/05 05:29:01 |
warped_candykid
Advanced Member
United States
3,985 posts
Joined: Jan, 2004
|
Posted - 2008/08/05 : 05:37:21
quote:
Originally posted by Ph33rViper:
on IMDB
The Deathly hallows will be 2 parts
I think thats BS Just have it as one nice long movie :D
Thats what I was thinking, just make it a nice, 3 1/2-4 hour long movie! Heck, you will need to because they spend half the book in hiding!
Alert moderator
|
Meathead
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
4,217 posts
Joined: Sep, 2006
|
Posted - 2008/08/05 : 09:55:32
I don't mind em splitting the film up tbh. Better than having all the good stuff from the books being left out of the films. Although, i agree i would like it to be just one long film and i wouldn't mind at all sitting through 3 or so hours of it (don't think any fan would).
__________________________________
"Music creates order out of chaos; for rhythm imposes unanimity upon the divergent, melody imposes continuity upon the disjointed, and harmony imposes compatibility upon the incongruous." -Sir Yehudi Menuhin
Alert moderator
|
bulby_g
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
7,205 posts
Joined: Apr, 2004
430 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2008/08/05 : 10:09:10
Twice as much profit springs to mind as the reason they may be doing this. ;)
Why have 1 Blockbuster movie when you can have 2 for the same amount of work and get away with it.
__________________________________
www.myspace.com/bulbyg
Alert moderator
|
Lilley
Advanced Member
Australia
3,740 posts
Joined: Jul, 2006
|
Posted - 2008/08/05 : 11:16:38
hmm. im fairly sure deathly hallows is not number 6, but rather number 7. so talking about number 7 doesnt really answer the question does it?
would make sense. unless they wanna cut out the half-blood prince connection completely and just have the search for the horcrux
__________________________________
nearly in line....
.....strange continuity problems
Alert moderator
|
Printer friendly
