| Author |
Thread |
|
meshblorg
Junior Member
United States
137 posts
Joined: Apr, 2006
|
 Posted - 2007/02/28 : 08:56:15
Most gabber sucks so I'm glad to see more happy hardcore. Gabber is just repetitive noisy crap most of the time.
Alert moderator 
|
Brian K
Advanced Member
United States
8,663 posts
Joined: Sep, 2001
528 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 09:40:29
quote:
Originally posted by clarke101:
Shocking that something called Bouncy Techno should sound like techno 
I know! =P
__________________________________
"we'll delete the weak"
Alert moderator
|
dj_deano
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
1,023 posts
Joined: Jun, 2005
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 10:36:34
Intro's are gay.
Id rather listen to the music.
__________________________________
REACTION DIGITAL MP3 STORE NOW OPEN!
HTTP://WWW.REACTION-EVENTS.COM
Alert moderator
|
Leto
Advanced Member
United States
2,849 posts
Joined: Jun, 2005
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 12:06:10
quote:
Originally posted by meshblorg:
Most gabber sucks so I'm glad to see more happy hardcore. Gabber is just repetitive noisy crap most of the time.
.......don't mean to sound mean, but all my friends in the US that don't understand dance music say that everything I listen to is repetitive noisy crap.
That includes UK hardcore, freeform, trance, and gabber. Perhaps you don't understand gabber. Give it a chance, it's pretty amazing. 100 percent raw energy.
BTW, repetitive noise crap = speedcore, which I like, cause it's fun and cheesy!
__________________________________
globalhardcorealliance.com
Alert moderator
Edited by - Leto on 2007/02/28 12:13:50 |
bulby_g
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
7,205 posts
Joined: Apr, 2004
430 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 14:33:09
quote:
Originally posted by meshblorg:
Most gabber sucks so I'm glad to see more happy hardcore. Gabber is just repetitive noisy crap most of the time.
I find that quite funny really...
Most mainstream Hardcore (be it Dutch, Italian, UK) all have VERY similar song structures, so to say one is repetitive and the other isn't is completely absurd.
And if your talking "non-mainstream" Gabber (I should imagine you're not as it's unlikely you've heard much of this if you don't like gabber) I'd say it jumps around quite allot and is actually less repetitive than UK Hardcore.
Seems more likely to me that you've just dismissed it as you don't like the general sound of it...
__________________________________
www.myspace.com/bulbyg
Alert moderator
Edited by - bulby_g on 2007/02/28 14:34:31 |
Elias
Junior Member
United Kingdom
106 posts
Joined: Feb, 2007
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 16:40:12
around the 90's most people i knew called gabba - hardcore/techno. Mainly due to the fact that helter skelter used to have technodrome events
Alert moderator
|
Elias
Junior Member
United Kingdom
106 posts
Joined: Feb, 2007
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 16:54:09
quote:
Originally posted by Brian K:
I talked to brisk about being booked to play a 95ish set and he said he thought it would be fun and was for it.
Yeah that would be fu**in' awesome!,
but i woz hoping that he would play some new skool bouncy techno coz his old tune were dope and theres no reason why he cant bring his old style into the 21st century because from wot ive heard there is definitely an audience
Alert moderator
|
meshblorg
Junior Member
United States
137 posts
Joined: Apr, 2006
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 20:00:05
Gabber by definition changes less and has a far more repetitive beat throughout the songs. I first heard Gabber when I bought Bonkers 15 and I hated Scott Brown's disk so much I almost threw it away.
Don't even say that hardcore is more repetitive because it has much more in the song while gabber has a constant, noisy, unpleasant to the ears: BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM
I see one of the biggest tragedies in hardcore history is the loss of many great netherlandish producers that either went to other genres, disapeared, or went into gabber.
Paul Elstak for example made some awesome happy tracks, however the rest of his stuff is like evil sounding gabber.
Alert moderator
|
Leto
Advanced Member
United States
2,849 posts
Joined: Jun, 2005
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 20:13:25
Loss of many producers????
You fail to realize that on the global scheme, Dutch Hardcore aka Gabber is more popular than UK hardcore.
Scott Brown has mixed and produced gabber from the very beginning of his career.
Boom Boom Boom boom ba Boom Boom Boom boom ba Boom Boom Boom
Gabber rocks! Of course, you are entitled to your opinion, just get the facts right. ;)
__________________________________
globalhardcorealliance.com
Alert moderator
|
jenks
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,701 posts
Joined: Feb, 2003
19 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 20:21:02
quote:
Originally posted by meshblorg:
Gabber by definition changes less and has a far more repetitive beat throughout the songs.
Rubbish, where did you get this definition? From Smoogie?
Alert moderator
|
The Doc
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
2,718 posts
Joined: Jan, 2006
|
Posted - 2007/02/28 : 22:43:07
quote:
Originally posted by jenks:
quote:
Originally posted by meshblorg:
Gabber by definition changes less and has a far more repetitive beat throughout the songs.
Rubbish, where did you get this definition? From Smoogie?
I think he means bouncy techno! (because thats what it is)
and thats why I like bouncy techno!
__________________________________
Rock you in your face! stab your brain with your nose bone!
Alert moderator
|
Rapid Bass
Junior Member
Australia
117 posts
Joined: Mar, 2005
|
Posted - 2007/03/03 : 09:49:31
Yep he still plays Gabber at the end of his sets like someone said. As for Brisk not playing the old bouncy gabber you like, I'm sure he would still play if it was still being produced. But sadly the Dutch fast gabber labels have all gone under. I myself used to love labels like Pengo, Baby Boom , Inferno and Dwarf etc.
__________________________________
I'm raw to the floor cause i love my hardcore.
You know the score and what i'm waiting for. Yeah bro it's banging hardcore!!
Alert moderator
|
Hard2Get
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
12,837 posts
Joined: Jun, 2001
|
Posted - 2007/03/03 : 12:01:03
quote:
Originally posted by Elias:
quote:
Originally posted by Brian K:
I talked to brisk about being booked to play a 95ish set and he said he thought it would be fun and was for it.
Yeah that would be fu**in' awesome!,
but i woz hoping that he would play some new skool bouncy techno coz his old tune were dope and theres no reason why he cant bring his old style into the 21st century because from wot ive heard there is definitely an audience
Sadly Bouncy Techno is no longer made.
Alert moderator
|
Meph751
Advanced Member
United States
1,488 posts
Joined: Dec, 2005
|
Posted - 2007/03/03 : 16:44:01
quote:
Originally posted by meshblorg:
Gabber by definition changes less and has a far more repetitive beat throughout the songs. I first heard Gabber when I bought Bonkers 15 and I hated Scott Brown's disk so much I almost threw it away.
Don't even say that hardcore is more repetitive because it has much more in the song while gabber has a constant, noisy, unpleasant to the ears: BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM
I see one of the biggest tragedies in hardcore history is the loss of many great netherlandish producers that either went to other genres, disapeared, or went into gabber.
Paul Elstak for example made some awesome happy tracks, however the rest of his stuff is like evil sounding gabber.
i'd love to see this so called definition of gabber.
basing your entire argument on the scott brown & neophyte disk on bonkers 15 is also very ignorant. there's a lot more to it, and just because you don't like it, doesnt make it repetitive and shitty.
go have any person who doesn't like UK Hardcore listen to it and tell you what they think of it. i guarantee they will complain about the annoying boom boom boom sound (the kickdrum) and the fact that it is repetitive and boring, which, coincidentally, is the same thing you seem to be complaining about!
__________________________________
Buy my records! :)
http://www.discogs.com/sell/list?seller=Meph
Alert moderator
|
The Doc
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
2,718 posts
Joined: Jan, 2006
|
Posted - 2007/03/04 : 01:51:28
quote:
Originally posted by meshblorg:
Gabber by definition changes less and has a far more repetitive beat throughout the songs. I first heard Gabber when I bought Bonkers 15 and I hated Scott Brown's disk so much I almost threw it away.
Don't even say that hardcore is more repetitive because it has much more in the song while gabber has a constant, noisy, unpleasant to the ears: BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM
Paul Elstak for example made some awesome happy tracks, however the rest of his stuff is like evil sounding gabber.
I see one of the biggest tragedies in hardcore history is the loss of many great netherlandish producers that either went to other genres, disapeared, or went into gabber.
Hardcore music has a LUXURY that no other forms of "Dance" music has! in other words we are lucky! we can pick and choose the styles we like! there are so many styles and genres of the music, a lot of people can pick and choose! some stay into a certain type! But if your really lucky like me, you love everything thats produced from the worst cheese to the hardest, fastest speedcore!
__________________________________
Rock you in your face! stab your brain with your nose bone!
Alert moderator
|
Printer friendly
