| Author |
Thread |
|
Craigavon raver
Advanced Member
Ireland
2,238 posts
Joined: Sep, 2007
|
 Posted - 2009/09/21 : 19:03:52
quote:
Originally posted by Wilky:
quote:
Originally posted by Craigavon raver:
it was the same on the bonkers cd not saying who done the remixes and it didn,t tell you in the inlay on bonkers either
typical aatw friging jokes!
very unproffesional
and there ameant to be the biggest dance music label in the uk and they can,t even print out proper track details
__________________________________
h.t.i.d
Alert moderator 
|
latininxtc
Advanced Member
United States
7,307 posts
Joined: Feb, 2006
|
Posted - 2009/09/21 : 19:16:02
quote:
Originally posted by Craigavon raver:
quote:
Originally posted by Wilky:
quote:
Originally posted by Craigavon raver:
it was the same on the bonkers cd not saying who done the remixes and it didn,t tell you in the inlay on bonkers either
typical aatw friging jokes!
very unproffesional
and there ameant to be the biggest dance music label in the uk and they can,t even print out proper track details
i don't think it was an accident that the track details was incomplete. since they are the biggest dance music in the uk obviously they're going to attract more attention than HU, and given that they many songs are ripoffs from some big names in the music industry, i think they're tryin to avoid some royalty payment to them. very shady
Alert moderator
|
Wilky
Banned
United Kingdom
6,198 posts
Joined: Mar, 2008
|
Posted - 2009/09/21 : 19:20:06
quote:
Originally posted by latininxtc:
quote:
Originally posted by Craigavon raver:
quote:
Originally posted by Wilky:
quote:
Originally posted by Craigavon raver:
it was the same on the bonkers cd not saying who done the remixes and it didn,t tell you in the inlay on bonkers either
typical aatw friging jokes!
very unproffesional
and there ameant to be the biggest dance music label in the uk and they can,t even print out proper track details
i don't think it was an accident that the track details was incomplete. since they are the biggest dance music in the uk obviously they're going to attract more attention than HU, and given that they many songs are ripoffs from some big names in the music industry, i think they're tryin to avoid some royalty payment to them. very shady
not a chance. these chart big names would sue em if they didnt get payed. they just whacked the tracklist 2gether without a care in the world
__________________________________
R.I.P ush.net
http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/wilky
This post was made by Spunk Licker
who is currently on your ignore list .
Display this post.
Alert moderator
|
Hard2Get
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
12,837 posts
Joined: Jun, 2001
|
Posted - 2009/09/21 : 20:40:36
quote:
Originally posted by Meathead:
Discogs can.
Ahh discogs.com, what will you think of next!
Alert moderator
|
MAtRiCks
Advanced Member
Canada
1,059 posts
Joined: Sep, 2006
|
Posted - 2009/09/21 : 22:43:23
quote:
Originally posted by latininxtc:
quote:
Originally posted by Craigavon raver:
quote:
Originally posted by Wilky:
quote:
Originally posted by Craigavon raver:
it was the same on the bonkers cd not saying who done the remixes and it didn,t tell you in the inlay on bonkers either
typical aatw friging jokes!
very unproffesional
and there ameant to be the biggest dance music label in the uk and they can,t even print out proper track details
i don't think it was an accident that the track details was incomplete. since they are the biggest dance music in the uk obviously they're going to attract more attention than HU, and given that they many songs are ripoffs from some big names in the music industry, i think they're tryin to avoid some royalty payment to them. very shady
nonsense my friend, the missing informations on the tracklist are the names of the remixers, not the name of the original artists.
If anybody would actually read the information on the back (or actually buy the album instead of pirating it!), they would find out it does say: CDs 1 & 2 - Remixes and Production by Re-Con & Squad-E unless otherwise stated
__________________________________
DJ MAtRiCks - http://www.rave.ca/member/matricks
Alert moderator
Edited by - MAtRiCks on 2009/09/21 22:44:29 |
MAtRiCks
Advanced Member
Canada
1,059 posts
Joined: Sep, 2006
|
Posted - 2009/09/21 : 22:45:10
quote:
Originally posted by Hard2Get:
quote:
Originally posted by Meathead:
Discogs can.
Ahh discogs.com, what will you think of next!
adding samples to releases! and they just implemented it! isn't Discogs simply magic?
**Edit** just checked again, it's not there anymore... maybe it's still in testing phase? Either way, Discogs = <3
__________________________________
DJ MAtRiCks - http://www.rave.ca/member/matricks
Alert moderator
Edited by - MAtRiCks on 2009/09/21 23:06:12 |
Meathead
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
4,217 posts
Joined: Sep, 2006
|
Posted - 2009/09/21 : 23:08:52
quote:
Originally posted by MAtRiCks:
quote:
Originally posted by Hard2Get:
quote:
Originally posted by Meathead:
Discogs can.
Ahh discogs.com, what will you think of next!
adding samples to releases! and they just implemented it! isn't Discogs simply magic?
**Edit** just checked again, it's not there anymore... maybe it's still in testing phase? Either way, Discogs = <3
Shit! I was just about to reply in amazement when i saw you'd editied it. I want it's babies
__________________________________
"Music creates order out of chaos; for rhythm imposes unanimity upon the divergent, melody imposes continuity upon the disjointed, and harmony imposes compatibility upon the incongruous." -Sir Yehudi Menuhin
Alert moderator
|
Craigavon raver
Advanced Member
Ireland
2,238 posts
Joined: Sep, 2007
|
Posted - 2009/10/03 : 12:50:20
quote:
Originally posted by MAtRiCks:
quote:
Originally posted by latininxtc:
quote:
Originally posted by Craigavon raver:
quote:
Originally posted by Wilky:
quote:
Originally posted by Craigavon raver:
it was the same on the bonkers cd not saying who done the remixes and it didn,t tell you in the inlay on bonkers either
typical aatw friging jokes!
very unproffesional
and there ameant to be the biggest dance music label in the uk and they can,t even print out proper track details
i don't think it was an accident that the track details was incomplete. since they are the biggest dance music in the uk obviously they're going to attract more attention than HU, and given that they many songs are ripoffs from some big names in the music industry, i think they're tryin to avoid some royalty payment to them. very shady
nonsense my friend, the missing informations on the tracklist are the names of the remixers, not the name of the original artists.
If anybody would actually read the information on the back (or actually buy the album instead of pirating it!), they would find out it does say: CDs 1 & 2 - Remixes and Production by Re-Con & Squad-E unless otherwise stated
but i,m on about the bonkers cd even though i could near enough predict who done what remix as what disc its on,but thats not the point they should be labeling the tracks correctly and in full
__________________________________
h.t.i.d
Alert moderator
|
|
Printer friendly
