My Area
Register
Donate
Help
FAQ
About us
Links
Articles
Competitions
Interviews
About HHC.com DJs
T-shirts and merchandise
Profile
Register
Active Topics
Topic Stats
Members
Search
Bookmarks
Add event
Label search
Artist search
Release / Track search

Raver's online
 Total online 3280
 Radio listeners 173+
Email Us!
Username: Password:

  Lost password
 Remember my login 
 All forums
 Music discussion - hardcore
 

Hardcore costs too much

 Printer friendly
Page: 
of 4

Author Thread  
__CMC__
Advanced Member



United Kingdom
593 posts
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posted - 2007/08/08 :  17:16:09  Show profile  Send a private message  Visit __CMC__'s homepage  Reply with quote
quote:
Originally posted by DjSamination:
since I use mp3s to DJ, i wouldn't want radio edits :P

anyways. _CMC_.. technically, vinyl doesn't have better quality than an MP3. It really is sad that tracks are sold in a format that cuts down on hearable bandwidths, but I'd rather prefer MP3 towards an crackly vinyl, that I need to buy a proper player,needle, cleaning set and cleaning software just to make it sound good on my computer afterwords.

I dont think people dont buy hardcore because of the price (or that the tracks are too long). I think it's mostly because not everyone who listens to Hardcore has a creditcard, or a paypal that is connected to an bankaccount.



Be under no illusion that an mp3 can be better sound than a vinyl! A used and abuse vinyl yes but a new vinyl not a hope in hell! But this descusion is about buying tunes, and you would have be stupid to buy a vinyl if it is not in good condition!

You say you use mp3's to dj, although i would agree they sound ok in the bedroom but when giging don't you notice the difference in sound quality? I certanily did when i first tried this and from then it was wav/aiff all the way!

If i buy records i rip them and store the file as a aiff (as wav doesn't incorperate the ID3 tag info), i picked up a western digital my book 500gb for just over £100 so stoarge space isn't a problem:)

My biggest gripe about the whole pricew is that they are selling you a inferior quality product yet if you work it out they are charging you more/making more money form selling you that! It ain't right.................


Alert moderator Go to top of page
Edited by - __CMC__ on 2007/08/08 17:46:29
Dain-Ja
Advanced Member



Canada
1,983 posts
Joined: Oct, 2004
Dain-Ja has attended 11 events
Posted - 2007/08/08 :  18:23:48  Show profile  Send a private message  Visit Dain-Ja's homepage  Reply with quote
agreed

mp3s sound fine at home, even on studio monitors, but on a big system you notice ALOT of change in the subbass and such


__________________________________
Producer/DJ/Label owner
Rush Delivery Records

Visit makemeRUSH.com for music from the ONLY North American hardcore label pressing vinyl!

FREE track every Monday: http://www.rushdeliveryrecords.com/?p=229




Alert moderator Go to top of page
Chew
New Member



United Kingdom
49 posts
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posted - 2007/08/08 :  18:38:14  Show profile  Send a private message  Visit Chew's homepage  Reply with quote
quote:
Originally posted by SickPigRecords:
bulls*** you shouldnt be doing it for the cash and even if you were you would get more than 100 bucks and if a tune takes you a day or two to make. 100 bucks for doing somthing you enjoy is good deal's



What he means is that if making Hardcore is your only income then you need to be able to make enough money to live off it.


Alert moderator Go to top of page
bulby_g
Advanced Member



United Kingdom
7,205 posts
Joined: Apr, 2004


430 hardcore releases
bulby_g has attended 55 events
Posted - 2007/08/08 :  19:25:48  Show profile  Send a private message  Visit bulby_g's homepage  Reply with quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dain-Ja:
agreed

mp3s sound fine at home, even on studio monitors, but on a big system you notice ALOT of change in the subbass and such



& agreed again.


__________________________________
www.myspace.com/bulbyg


Alert moderator Go to top of page
Samination
Advanced Member



Sweden
13,282 posts
Joined: Jul, 2004


195 hardcore releases
Samination has attended 17 events
Posted - 2007/08/08 :  21:27:59  Show profile  Send a private message  Visit Samination's homepage  Reply with quote
quote:
Originally posted by __CMC__:
quote:
Originally posted by DjSamination:
since I use mp3s to DJ, i wouldn't want radio edits :P

anyways. _CMC_.. technically, vinyl doesn't have better quality than an MP3. It really is sad that tracks are sold in a format that cuts down on hearable bandwidths, but I'd rather prefer MP3 towards an crackly vinyl, that I need to buy a proper player,needle, cleaning set and cleaning software just to make it sound good on my computer afterwords.

I dont think people dont buy hardcore because of the price (or that the tracks are too long). I think it's mostly because not everyone who listens to Hardcore has a creditcard, or a paypal that is connected to an bankaccount.



Be under no illusion that an mp3 can be better sound than a vinyl! A used and abuse vinyl yes but a new vinyl not a hope in hell! But this descusion is about buying tunes, and you would have be stupid to buy a vinyl if it is not in good condition!

You say you use mp3's to dj, although i would agree they sound ok in the bedroom but when giging don't you notice the difference in sound quality? I certanily did when i first tried this and from then it was wav/aiff all the way!

If i buy records i rip them and store the file as a aiff (as wav doesn't incorperate the ID3 tag info), i picked up a western digital my book 500gb for just over £100 so stoarge space isn't a problem:)

My biggest gripe about the whole pricew is that they are selling you a inferior quality product yet if you work it out they are charging you more/making more money form selling you that! It ain't right.................



basicly 90% of my vinyls where new when i bought them, and only a handfew of them where good enough without having to forcible clean. anyways

Well i got 780GB internal HDD space so i cant say i am at loss of space (well my Anime is taking up loads of space :P) anyways, FLAC might be a better format when it comes to "near-perfect" quality. for smaller files (just like MP3), I think AAC+ (not itunes AAC) might be better than MP3, since it seems to save up on different kinds of frequences than MP3 (AACplusv2 sounds crispier than MP3)


__________________________________
---------------------------------------------
Samination, Swedish Hardcore DJ
Happy, UK Hardcore, Freeform, Makina and Gabber
http://samination.se/
---------------------------------------------


Alert moderator Go to top of page



New PostPost Reply
Topic is 4 pages long: 1  2  3  4
 Printer friendly
  Verified artist
   Donating member How to donate

It took 0.46 ninja's to process this page!

HappyHardcore.com

    

1999 - 2026 HappyHardcore.com
audio: PRS for music. Build: 3.1.73.1

Go to top of page