| Author |
Thread |
|
Meph751
Advanced Member
United States
1,488 posts
Joined: Dec, 2005
|
 Posted - 2007/12/16 : 01:39:03
quote:
Originally posted by raindancerob:
as i said above if you can mix it doesnt matter
are you educated? do you understand english? all i am saying is that 33's and 45's are clearly different, and some people (myself included) much prefer mixing with 45's because they find 33's harder to use. harder does not mean impossible. it doesn't mean i only mix 45's. it just means its more difficult.
__________________________________
Buy my records! :)
http://www.discogs.com/sell/list?seller=Meph
Alert moderator 
Edited by - Meph751 on 2007/12/16 01:39:24 |
silver
Admin
Japan
12,579 posts
Joined: Feb, 2001
894 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 03:35:40
The further spaced out the grooves are on a record the better sound quality, you can fit around 14 mins on a record at 45 before you have to start to reduce the quality of it. 33 is 18 mins I believe. Yes 45 sounds better than 33 because it spins faster and the cuts and grooves in a record are more spread out (due to the speed). But to an average person they wont notice the difference between 33 and 45, it's really down to how good the guy making the metal work for the vinyl is.
Anything higher than that they have reduced the quality, you don't notice the different in your parents albums because you never heard the very orginial, I'm sure it sounded different.
Alert moderator
|
raindance-rob
Average Member
United Kingdom
194 posts
Joined: Aug, 2007
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 06:46:19
Meph751 you have an attitude problem do uno that
Alert moderator
|
raindance-rob
Average Member
United Kingdom
194 posts
Joined: Aug, 2007
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 08:29:32
? what about 78's then silver ? iv never heard one.
Alert moderator
|
bulby_g
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
7,205 posts
Joined: Apr, 2004
430 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 10:15:20
Track times vary depending on the type of plate and the overall loudness. The following track times are recommendations based on maximum loudness. Tracks that exceed the maximum length can still be cut, but may be subject to a reduction in loudness.
12 inch 7-8 minutes per side
10 inch 5-6 minutes per side
7 inch 3-3:30 minutes per side
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 inch*
10 inch*
7 inch**
*Maximum number of tracks per side: 2
**Maximum number of tracks per side: 1
__________________________________
www.myspace.com/bulbyg
Alert moderator
|
clarke101
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,839 posts
Joined: Jun, 2003
185 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 10:38:38
where did you copy those from? I think we all know that 2 tracks isn't the maximum for a 12".
__________________________________
Panda Style
Alert moderator
|
bulby_g
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
7,205 posts
Joined: Apr, 2004
430 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 10:51:40
They're from dubstudio. That's how many he will put on.
Sorry should have made that clearer :P
__________________________________
www.myspace.com/bulbyg
Alert moderator
Edited by - bulby_g on 2007/12/16 11:18:24 |
clarke101
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,839 posts
Joined: Jun, 2003
185 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 12:22:57
I guessed it was from somewhere like that. Any idea what that's on material wise.
__________________________________
Panda Style
Alert moderator
|
bulby_g
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
7,205 posts
Joined: Apr, 2004
430 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 13:18:13
Yea they're proper vinyl dubs.
__________________________________
www.myspace.com/bulbyg
Alert moderator
|
Meph751
Advanced Member
United States
1,488 posts
Joined: Dec, 2005
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 15:42:50
quote:
Originally posted by raindancerob:
Meph751 you have an attitude problem do uno that
we're having a perfectly fine discussion and then out of nowhere you come in with this:
quote:
you find it harder to mix with 33's then 45's wtf its the bpm not the speed of the rpm, learn to mix.
i find that slightly more than a little bit belligerent, as well as an incredibly stupid thing to say, because if you had a shred of reading comprehension you would see that nowhere were we discussing the bpm of tracks. your comment was offensive, as well as stupid.
__________________________________
Buy my records! :)
http://www.discogs.com/sell/list?seller=Meph
Alert moderator
Edited by - Meph751 on 2007/12/16 15:44:10 |
Dain-Ja
Advanced Member
Canada
1,983 posts
Joined: Oct, 2004
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 16:12:58
raindancerob is clearly an idiot, just ignore him
even if someone that "can mix" will have no trouble with it, that doesn't mean it's not harder to mix on 33 in the first place (it wasn't for me cause I learnt both at the same time)
and silver: I most definitely notice the difference in sound quality
that doesn't mean 45s can't sound bad, they often do (damn Next Gen), but my best 45s sound way better than my best 33s
__________________________________
Producer/DJ/Label owner
Rush Delivery Records
Visit makemeRUSH.com for music from the ONLY North American hardcore label pressing vinyl!
FREE track every Monday: http://www.rushdeliveryrecords.com/?p=229
Alert moderator
|
__CMC__
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
593 posts
Joined: Aug, 2007
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 16:35:18
So anyone got more info on the question i asked previously?
If the sound quality ain't as good on a 33 since all the hiphop/r&b labels (major labels) press there vinyl at 33 is this just for the minority that will be djing (doing tricks) with them?
Alert moderator
|
raindance-rob
Average Member
United Kingdom
194 posts
Joined: Aug, 2007
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 20:16:59
mixing is about bpm not rpm
Alert moderator
|
Meph751
Advanced Member
United States
1,488 posts
Joined: Dec, 2005
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 20:30:16
quote:
Originally posted by raindancerob:
mixing is about bpm not rpm
you are so unbelievably stupid i can't even comprehend it
__________________________________
Buy my records! :)
http://www.discogs.com/sell/list?seller=Meph
Alert moderator
|
Vitalism
Advanced Member
Canada
1,707 posts
Joined: Oct, 2005
|
Posted - 2007/12/16 : 20:42:52
mixing is about both actually, i think so anyways... probably more so about bpm than rpm... again in my mind.
goal for mixing = make the bpms identical.
rpm doesn't have muuuuuuch to do with mixing, as far as i can understand, except for sound quality.
Alert moderator
|
Printer friendly
